> "Bob Meyer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well, the main reason I'd opt for the faster lens is
> because of the larger aperture, not focus differences,
> but yes, I agree. But by the same token I suppose you
> could say the the EOS is suboptimal compared to a 1v.
> That doesn't mean it's inadequate, however, and I
> don't think AF with the 28-135 is inadequate, either.
Hi Bob,
Would this wording be better?
"The EOS 3 and 1v are supposed to autofocus optimally on
horizontal and diagonal detail with lenses faster than f/8
or even f/9. Autofocus works even more optimally on
horizontal and vertical detail with lenses faster than f/4."
Canon's description of the HP/NP AF system confused me
terribly when I was camera shopping. I get the same feeling
when looking at lenses marked with "Ultrasonic" and "Macro"
%-/
Cheers
Julian Loke
*
****
*******
***********************************************************
* For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
* http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
***********************************************************
