>> http://bobatkins.photo.net/info/faq30/eos3af.html

> "Plumviewer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: ...
> And, repeated acknowledgment that the 70-200 2.8 L is kind of
> an AF odd ball ...

Hi Plums,

This point escaped me.  What do you mean about the 70-200/2.8?

Cheers
Julian Loke

*
****
*******
***********************************************************
*  For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
*    http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
***********************************************************

Reply via email to