>> http://bobatkins.photo.net/info/faq30/eos3af.html > "Plumviewer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: ... > And, repeated acknowledgment that the 70-200 2.8 L is kind of > an AF odd ball ... Hi Plums, This point escaped me. What do you mean about the 70-200/2.8? Cheers Julian Loke * **** ******* *********************************************************** * For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see: * http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm ***********************************************************
- Re: EOS 3 Lenses Bob Meyer
- EOS New Member Michael R. Hinkle
- Re: EOS 3 Lenses John Chennavasin
- Re: EOS 3 Lenses jul . loke
- AF with EOS 3 & 28-135 IS Ray Amos
- Re: AF with EOS 3 & 28-135 IS Julian Loke
- Re: AF with EOS 3 & 28-135 IS Tim Munro
- Re: EOS 3 Lenses Plumviewer
- Re: EOS 3 Lenses Julian Loke
- Re: AF Precision (was EOS 3 Lenses) Plumviewer
- Re: AF Precision (was EOS 3 Lenses) Julian Loke
- Re: AF Precision (was EOS 3 Lenses) Plumviewer
- Re: AF Precision (was EOS 3 Lenses) Hugo G�vert
- Re: EOS 3 Lenses Thomas Bantel
- Re: EOS 3 Lenses Bob Meyer
- Re: EOS 3 Lenses Julian Loke
- Re: EOS 3 Lenses Bob Meyer
- Re: EOS 3 Lenses Julian Loke
- Re: EOS 3 Lenses Bob Meyer
- Re: EOS 3 Lenses Hugo G�vert
- Re: EOS 3 Lenses Julian Loke
