>I'm with Skip on this. I have both lenses and this is the reason why, the
>28-135 is a really useful travel/muck around lens. The extra focal length

  I agree, I think 28-135 is more interesting as THE travel lens. But I'd like it to 
be 24-120 (for 
example, but it should have similar optical quality), since 28 can be somewhat short.

  Only a suggestion to improve the Canon lenses lineup.

  From Badalona,
  Gabriel

  El meu web - mi web - my website: http://www.massipfons.com


*
****
*******
***********************************************************
*  For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
*    http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
***********************************************************

Reply via email to