Bob Sull wrote:
>
> Skip wrote:
>
> > But not all of it, and you do lose depth of field wide open. And you
> > still lack the reach of the 28-135. I seldom find myself at 70mm, more
> > often at 28, 50, 100 and 135.
> > Skip
>
> This is just another example of the benefits of this forum.
>
> Someone asks a question seeking help to make a decision and gets many
> answers explaining the viewpoints and opinions of a lot of people based
> on their experiences and preferences. They have a lot of things to
> consider, some that they may not have thought of on their own.
>
> Bob
>
> --
> //////
> ( 0 0 )
> -73 de Bob [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Everybody has a photographic memory. Some just don't have any film.
>
It is a good bunch, isn't it? And nobody feels they have to defend any
position to the death, so things usually stay quite civilized, unlike
some of the newsgroups!
Skip
--
Shadowcatcher Imagery
http://www.shadowcatcherimagery.com
*
****
*******
***********************************************************
* For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
* http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
***********************************************************
