Bob Meyer wrote: > My urban assault kit <g>, when I'm going out to do > some serious shooting, used to consist of a 17-35, a > 28-135, a 50mm 1.8 and a 100-300 USM. But I no longer > have the 100-300, and the 70-200 2.8 is awfully heavy, > so I may need to do something about that. The 200/2.8L would seem to be the ticket. :-) fcc * **** ******* *********************************************************** * For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see: * http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm ***********************************************************
- Re: EOS 28-70 L: the ideal travel lens? Chris Valentine
- Re: EOS 28-70 L: the ideal travel lens? Skip
- Re: EOS 28-70 L: the ideal travel lens? Tim Munro
- Re: EOS 28-70 L: the ideal travel lens? Gabriel Massip Fons
- Re: EOS 28-70 L: the ideal travel lens? Bob Sull
- Re: EOS 28-70 L: the ideal travel lens? Bob Sull
- Re: EOS 28-70 L: the ideal travel lens? Bob Meyer
- Re: EOS 28-70 L: the ideal travel lens? F. Craig Callahan
- Re: EOS 28-70 L: the ideal travel len... Bob Meyer
- Re: EOS 28-70 L: the ideal trave... F. Craig Callahan
- Re: EOS 28-70 L: the ideal travel lens? Steve Maller
- Re: EOS 28-70 L: the ideal travel lens? Gary Russell
- Fwd: Re: EOS 28-70 L: the ideal travel lens? c . p . valentine
