Bob Meyer wrote: > > > > The 200/2.8L would seem to be the ticket. :-) > > Yep, that's probably a good fit. But right now my > budget says "wait." Ah, those pesky budgets! If it helps any, I recently saw two 200/2.8Ls on KEH's website for less than $500 each (US). fcc * **** ******* *********************************************************** * For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see: * http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm ***********************************************************
- Re: EOS 28-70 L: the ideal travel lens? Tim Munro
- Re: EOS 28-70 L: the ideal travel lens? Gabriel Massip Fons
- Re: EOS 28-70 L: the ideal travel lens? Bob Sull
- Re: EOS 28-70 L: the ideal travel lens? Bob Sull
- Re: EOS 28-70 L: the ideal travel lens? Bob Meyer
- Re: EOS 28-70 L: the ideal travel lens? F. Craig Callahan
- Re: EOS 28-70 L: the ideal travel lens? Bob Meyer
- Re: EOS 28-70 L: the ideal travel len... F. Craig Callahan
- Re: EOS 28-70 L: the ideal travel lens? Steve Maller
- Re: EOS 28-70 L: the ideal travel lens? Gary Russell
- Fwd: Re: EOS 28-70 L: the ideal travel lens? c . p . valentine
