Bob Sull wrote:
> >
> > I'd have to vote for the 28-135 IS as the ideal travel lens, if you're
> > only going to pick one. Though not as sharp as the "L" lenses, it is
> > sharp, has the same width as the 28-70 with more reach, and IS will let
> > you use it in low light situations where flash is not allowed, like
> > museums, and still get good depth of field.
> > Skip
>
> But the f/2.8 of the 28-70L makes up for a good bit of lacking IS.
>
> Bob
>
But not all of it, and you do lose depth of field wide open. And you
still lack the reach of the 28-135. I seldom find myself at 70mm, more
often at 28, 50, 100 and 135.
Skip
--
Shadowcatcher Imagery
http://www.shadowcatcherimagery.com
*
****
*******
***********************************************************
* For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
* http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
***********************************************************
