On Mon, 18 Jun 2001 23:35:18 -0400, you wrote: >Why? Please elaborate I'd like to hear, too. To me the PC data transfer alone would be worth quite a bit, and usable with any lens. >Wilber Jeffcoat > >> Unless you own one of the new image-stabilized super telephotos, the 1V is >> not worth it. >> Ken Durling Website http://home.earthlink.net/~kdurling/ Alternate e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * **** ******* *********************************************************** * For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see: * http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm ***********************************************************
- EOS New body recommendations: 1V vs. 3 w/PB Pattie Anderson
- Re: EOS New body recommendations: 1V vs. ... Ken Lin
- Re: EOS New body recommendations: 1V vs. ... Tim Munro
- Re: EOS New body recommendations: 1V vs. ... John Chennavasin
- Re: EOS New body recommendations: 1V ... Margaret Jeffcoat
- Re: EOS New body recommendations:... Ken Durling
- Re: EOS New body recommendations: 1V vs. ... Snorre A. Selmer
- Re: EOS New body recommendations: 1V vs. ... Devin Shieh
- RE:EOS New body recommendations: 1V vs. 3... Steven Kefford
- RE: EOS New body recommendations: 1V vs. ... Kotsinadelis, Peter (Peter)
- Re: EOS New body recommendations: 1V vs. ... Tim Munro
- RE: EOS New body recommendations: 1V vs. ... Kotsinadelis, Peter (Peter)
- Re: EOS New body recommendations: 1V vs. ... Gary Russell
- Re: EOS New body recommendations: 1V vs. ... Julian Loke
- Re: EOS New body recommendations: 1V vs. ... c . p . valentine
- Re: EOS New body recommendations: 1V vs. ... Snorre A. Selmer
