>A decades old Canon F1 (or whatever) is still capable of delivering > >images, >that are no worse than those taken by a EOS 1V or Nikon F5. Must be >magic >;-) I agree with you (most of the rest of the mail) but here we should maybe compare cameras *and* film since you can't change sensors in digital cameras. So, how about e.g. todays ISO400 slide film compared to 1970's ISO400 film? Thus with digital cameras the image quality *will* improve during the next couple years which makes them different from 35mm cameras, but I'm not sure if the improvement will be significan't for most of us. Vesa _________________________________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. * **** ******* *********************************************************** * For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see: * http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm ***********************************************************
- Re: EOS Re: The new digital move Gpmsu
- Re: EOS Re: The new digital move Thomas Bantel
- Re: EOS Re: The new digital move Brian Fancher
- EOS Re: The new digital move Henry Posner/B&H Photo-Video
- Re: EOS Re: The new digital move Gerry Kaslowski
- RE: EOS Re: The new digital move gawaine maxwell
- EOS Re: The new digital move Tom DelRosario
- Re: EOS Re: The new digital move Lars Michael
- Re: EOS Re: The new digital move Thomas Bantel
- EOS Re: The new digital move Vesa Perala
- Re: EOS Re: The new digital move Vesa Perala
- Re: EOS Re: The new digital move Thomas Bantel
- EOS Re: The new digital move Vesa Perala
- RE: EOS Re: The new digital move Kotsinadelis, Peter (Peter)
- Re: EOS Re: The new digital move Lars Michael
- Re: EOS Re: The new digital move Thomas Bantel
- Re: EOS Re: The new digital move jul . loke
- Re: EOS Re: The new digital move Thomas Bantel
- RE: EOS Re: The new digital move F�lix L�pez de Maturana
- Re: EOS Re: The new digital move Thomas Bantel
- Re: EOS Re: The new digital move Lars Michael
