> > I agree with you (most of the rest of the mail) but here we should > > maybe compare cameras *and* film since you can't change sensors in > > digital cameras. So, how about e.g. todays ISO400 slide film > > compared to 1970's ISO400 film? > > > >I should have made my point a little more clear, actually I wanted to >point >out exactly what you wrote. With traditional cameras, the sensor is ................. >Thomas Bantel Sorry for being staid (?) while reading your post ;-) Vesa _________________________________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. * **** ******* *********************************************************** * For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see: * http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm ***********************************************************
- Re: EOS Re: The new digital move Brian Fancher
- EOS Re: The new digital move Henry Posner/B&H Photo-Video
- Re: EOS Re: The new digital move Gerry Kaslowski
- RE: EOS Re: The new digital move gawaine maxwell
- EOS Re: The new digital move Tom DelRosario
- Re: EOS Re: The new digital move Lars Michael
- Re: EOS Re: The new digital move Thomas Bantel
- EOS Re: The new digital move Vesa Perala
- EOS Re: The new digital move Vesa Perala
- Re: EOS Re: The new digital move Thomas Bantel
- RE: EOS Re: The new digital move Vesa Perala
- RE: EOS Re: The new digital move Kotsinadelis, Peter (Peter)
- Re: EOS Re: The new digital move Lars Michael
- Re: EOS Re: The new digital move Thomas Bantel
- Re: EOS Re: The new digital move jul . loke
- Re: EOS Re: The new digital move Thomas Bantel
- RE: EOS Re: The new digital move F�lix L�pez de Maturana
- Re: EOS Re: The new digital move Thomas Bantel
- Re: EOS Re: The new digital move Lars Michael
- EOS Re: OT film Lars Michael
- Re: EOS Re: The new digital move Mr. Bill
