On Mon, 13 May 2002 10:07:31 -0700, you wrote: >I do not think it is unreasonable to expect that a $300+ flash should be >able to at least provide consistent exposures.
Why? Conisistent exposures under what conditions? Often the more sophisticated a piece of equipment is, the more you have to know to operate it well. I would never expect a piece of camera equipment to do my work for me. If it did, it wouldn't be my work. Isn't photography about control in response to conditions? Ken Durling Visit my new easier-to-browse PhotoSIG portfolio: http://www.photosig.com/browse.php?id=photographer:203 * **** ******* *********************************************************** * For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see: * http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm ***********************************************************
