> >I do not think it is unreasonable to expect that a $300+ flash should be >able to at least provide consistent exposures. > >Actually with film, it is not that bad, but somehow with digital it is... > >Add to that the lack of clear cut documentation from Canon.
Agreed...with the D30/D60 and the 420ex flash is really hit or miss...mostly miss IME. I have gotten to where when using on camera flash with the D60 I use RAW mode just so that I can correct the exposure at processing time. Is REALLY annoying! -- Harrison McClary http://www.mcclary.net * **** ******* *********************************************************** * For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see: * http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm ***********************************************************
