"Icoz, Evrim" wrote:
>
> Peter, I am not sure if this is what you intended, knowing you, I do not
> think so.
>
> But,
>
> I just don't like responses like that - it assumes that the person using the
> flash is stupid. It is like the emperor's clothes...
>
> I do not think it is unreasonable to expect that a $300+ flash should be
> able to at least provide consistent exposures.
>
> Actually with film, it is not that bad, but somehow with digital it is...
I moved from an EOS-5 and 540-EX to an EOS-3 and 550-EX. My flash shots
were immediately better. I have had no problems with E-TTL. It works
great.
Bob
--
//////
( 0 0 )
-73 de Bob [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Organized people are just too lazy to look for things.
All outgoing messages scanned by Norton Anti Virus.
*
****
*******
***********************************************************
* For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
* http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
***********************************************************
