Don wrote: Ok I will jump in hear and say "To Each His Own" there are many rules in photography and the biggest rule is to not follow the rules. Peter- what you and others like are not necessarily what others like in a portrait. Is there any need to continue this thread? Are the gloves coming out. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Agreed, no need to continue. My gloves are staying where they are. ;-) * **** ******* *********************************************************** * For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see: * http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm ***********************************************************
- RE: EOS 70-200L IS or 100-400L IS ? Kotsinadelis, Peter (Peter)
- EOS 70-200L IS or 100-400L IS ? Kotsinadelis, Peter (Peter)
- RE: EOS 70-200L IS or 100-400L IS ? Robert Meier
- RE: EOS 70-200L IS or 100-400L IS ? Icoz, Evrim
- RE: EOS 70-200L IS or 100-400L IS ? David Chan
- RE: EOS 70-200L IS or 100-400L IS ? Kotsinadelis, Peter (Peter)
- RE: EOS 70-200L IS or 100-400L IS ? Robert Meier
- In/Out of focus portrait work -- was ... David Primm
- RE:Portraits [was: EOS 70-200L IS or 100-... Bob Meyer
- Re: EOS 70-200L IS or 100-400L IS ? Don
- RE: EOS 70-200L IS or 100-400L IS ? Kotsinadelis, Peter (Peter)
- RE: EOS 70-200L IS or 100-400L IS ? Jorrit de Jager
- Re: EOS 70-200L IS or 100-400L IS ? Tim Munro
- Re: EOS 70-200L IS or 100-400L IS ? Mark Ravensdale
- Re: EOS 70-200L IS or 100-400L IS ? Bob Meyer
- Re: EOS 70-200L IS or 100-400L IS ? Ray Amos
