> > The D60 is relegated from a real camera to an amateur's toy. > Is this for real? What kind of a remark is that. A reflection of how I feel it will be percieved by gadget freaks?
;o) > I guess suddenly D60 started taking worse pictures???? > There is a huge market for D60/D100/S2. I'll give you a clue: no. The 1n still is as good as it was before the 3 before the 1v My old 1970's Fujica manual still produces pictures as good as the 1n ... it's just less cuddly to use ;o) > Geez, why the need to make such comments???? Turn this on head and you have an even more revealing question: "Why the need to get upset about someone saying something about a camera?" That is the real thing to think about. A camera is a tool. Where does all the bolleaux about "pro" and "am" come from (Canon's marketing Dept????). In real life pros still use whatever tool is fit for the job: EOS 50s, EOS 5 ... it's being task centred not equipment centred. Is some areas of pro photography "image" is a huge part of the package: not the quality of the photos but being seen to have the latest. A D60 is an amateur's camera today - the big boys will be buying the big toys. When it comes to the crunch though - will the photos be any better than they could have produced with lesser cameras? * **** ******* *********************************************************** * For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see: * http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm ***********************************************************
