> -----Original Message----- > From: John Lovda [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2002 12:02 PM
.. snip > One thing I haven't figured out is what does a > "digital" photographer do if he/she really needs a > shot in the 14mm to 18mm range? Do they have to keep > an old Rebel 2000 film body and scan the slides? > John Really, how often or how many photographers shoot at 14mm or 18mm, and how many even have lenses in that range. If you a wide angle freak I guess the D60 is not for you. Since I got my D60, my EOS 3 has not been touched (it back in the black box the camera came in) and in fact I will be putting it on sale. With the D60 I shoot more, have less costs (i.e no film processing costs ) and have not said "Damm I wish I had brought my EOS 3". The only complaint about the D60 is the auto focus (which I know how to work around) and I wish it had firewire support for file downloads. > --- Harrison Mcclary <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Well....as a working photographer who has 2 D60's > > the reduced sensor size > > really does not bother me at all. What matters to me > > is the quality of > > the image, and in that respeect the D60 delivers. I > > think this full frame > > stuff is WAY over blown, but to each his own. > > > > Once upon a time John Lovda said: > > > > > but with the reduced sensor > > >size, lens have the multiplier effect. Before the > > 1Ds > > >came out there were many comments on this board > > that > > >the "holy grail" of achievement was about 6mp AND a > > >24x36 image size. > > * **** ******* *********************************************************** * For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see: * http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm ***********************************************************
