"Kotsinadelis, Peter (Peter)" schrieb: > > John Lovda wrote (edited): > > Before the 1Ds came out there were many comments > on this board that the "holy grail" of achievement was > about 6mp AND a 24x36 image size. > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > - > Yes, and realize that there are still people who believe > vinyl records sound best and CDs are a fad.
And maybe they are not so far off track as it seems. Probably not because of the bad quality of the CD system, but because of the lousy recordings that have become standard over the last decade. Sometimes it's really a shame. As for the sensor size, I won't say it's a "holy grail". But it would save a lot of my investment in lenses. It will never be possible to get the same image quality from the same lenses when you don't use the full frame. Smaller sensor sizes need more lens resolution than bigger sensors. Smaller sensors also need smaller focal lengths to get a real wide angle. That's all that is to it. No magic or legends involved ;-) Thomas Bantel * **** ******* *********************************************************** * For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see: * http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm ***********************************************************
