----- Original Message ----- From: "Nabil Esphahani" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, November 27, 2002 2:22 PM Subject: RE: EOS Canon 24-85 vs Sigma 24-70/2.8 vs Sigma 28-70/2.8
> Is that a recommendation for the Tokina (which one) or just a question? > If it is better than all the ones I mentioned I would go for it. > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Alan Bell > Sent: Wednesday, November 27, 2002 4:58 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: EOS Canon 24-85 vs Sigma 24-70/2.8 vs Sigma 28-70/2.8 > > > How about the Tokina? > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Nabil > > Esphahani > > Sent: Wednesday, November 27, 2002 1:50 PM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: EOS Canon 24-85 vs Sigma 24-70/2.8 vs Sigma 28-70/2.8 > > > > > > Since at the time being I can not afford the Canon Ls (24-70 or > > 28-70), I am looking for opinions regarding the above three lenses. I > > would prefer the Sigma 24-70/2.8 but if either of the other two > > provides better performance I would pick one of them. > > > > The Tokina 28-70 f2.8, and the older 2.6-2.8, are said to be stellar performers, based on an Angineaux design. Skip Middleton www.shadowcatcherimagery.com * **** ******* *********************************************************** * For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see: * http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm ***********************************************************
