There's an analysis on the Luminous Landscape web site that concludes there's little photographic quality improvement between the older 2.0X and the newer 2.0X II extenders.
Regards, Bill > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Neukranz, > Bill > Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 12:11 PM > Subject: RE: EOS Another Lens Debate: 300 f/2.8 vs 100-400 IS ... results were always a little soft. The EF 2X noticeably reduced contrast and image sharpness on my chromes. This was also visible but to a much lesser degree on prints but still visible. The current EF 2X II should improve this somewhat and I'm hoping that I can live with the results when used on the medium sensor EOS 1D body with the EF 70-200 2.8L IS. Otherwise * **** ******* *********************************************************** * For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see: * http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm ***********************************************************
