> -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Dickbo > Sent: Tuesday, July 29, 2003 3:56 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: G5 [was Re: EOS 1Ds & 10D interface] > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Chip Louie" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Tuesday, July 29, 2003 6:31 PM > Subject: RE: G5 [was Re: EOS 1Ds & 10D interface] > > > > It's not the number of pixels but the photosite size that > matters. Image > > quality is more dependent on sensor size, photosite size and sensor > > characteristics than the number of photosites. > > On the basis of the above statement we must believe that the best quality > will come from a one pixel sensor then? nest pas mon brave? > > >
Hi Dickbo, Well, my comment taken out of context as you have makes it sound incorrect. But of course I'm correct, one pixel that's large enough will capture as virtually perfect an image a can be formed on it. All you have to do is point it at your subject a lot of times really really fast. Cheers/Chip * **** ******* *********************************************************** * For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see: * http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm ***********************************************************
