> -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Thomas Bantel > Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 1:14 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: G5 [was Re: EOS 1Ds & 10D interface] > > > Bob Meyer wrote: > > --- "Neukranz, Bill" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > >>And I think there's no comparison between a G5 (or a > >>G3 for that matter) and > >>a 10D. > > > > > > Well, it all depends. The 10d is certainly capable of > > far better quality. But for web shots, or small > > snapshot type prints (parties and that sort of thing), > > the G3 actually holds its own. > > > > Given an 600x400 or so, moderately compressed jpeg on > > a 17 inch monitor running 1024x768, I'm not sure most > > people could tell the difference. > > > > Absolutely agreed. The G3 image quality is really not all that > bad at ISO 50. Using RAW mode and with a little care during > processing, you can get quite amazing pictures out of this > little box ;-) The big difference is in speed and handling. > Also in noise of course, so you have to be careful when > sharpening the G3 images. > > Thomas Bantel > >
Hi Thomas, Are you using LAB color sharpening? Cheers/Chip * **** ******* *********************************************************** * For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see: * http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm ***********************************************************
