--- "Neukranz, Bill" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > And I think there's no comparison between a G5 (or a > G3 for that matter) and > a 10D.
Well, it all depends. The 10d is certainly capable of far better quality. But for web shots, or small snapshot type prints (parties and that sort of thing), the G3 actually holds its own. Given an 600x400 or so, moderately compressed jpeg on a 17 inch monitor running 1024x768, I'm not sure most people could tell the difference. ===== Bob Meyer I wish I knew what I know now, when I was younger... http://www.meyerweb.net/epson __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo http://search.yahoo.com * **** ******* *********************************************************** * For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see: * http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm ***********************************************************
