----- Original Message ----- From: "Willem-Jan Markerink" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, July 30, 2004 1:28 AM
...> PS: don't forget that a large amount of Contax users will originate > from the old days, where 'Zeiss' was still the only thing worthwile, > apart from Leica....it's probably just as much a generation-shift > than a technology-shift. > (how does their full-sensor digicam do btw?....Pentax lost that > battle without even releasing one, but I never saw comparison tests > between the Contax and EOS/Kodak either) W-J, A dealer I know was really enthusiastic about the Contax N Digital and thought it would take the market by storm. The sample prints that I saw were excellent. I remember him making convincing argument and trying to justify the cost of a complete change of lenses. But that's how he ran his Rolls Royce! I think I came to the conclusion that, given the cost, I would have been better of with a digital back for my MF. A comparison with the Kodak Pro might be interesting and I suspect show how Contax were ahead of the game. http://www.luminous-landscape.com/reviews/cameras/contax-n-digital.shtml CraigZ -- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.730 / Virus Database: 485 - Release Date: 28/07/2004 * **** ******* *********************************************************** * For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see: * http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm ***********************************************************
