> Subject: Re: EOS Possible model between 20D & 1D Mk II > > > I would like a camera of it's capabilities with a full CCD that > > matches the EOS 3's weather sealant capabilities. > . . . > Me too. Other features in the 3 I miss are AF at f/8, focus speed, > brigher viewfinder and spot metering. > . . . > Actually I'd be happy enough with the 1DmkII if I could get one > without the vertical grip. Now it's just too bulky to carry. > . . . > perspective. It is true that most amateurs won't need that > level of weather > sealing, but some pros seem to be ready to pay for it, > probably because they > need it. > . . . > > Btw, focusing at f8 is very useful if you use TCs. I know I'm > > going to miss that feature if I buy a 20D. > > > > Regards, > > > > Hugo > > You're SO right, I really miss that ability. Enough that I've > considered a > 1D beater just for that purpose. >
I finally did get the 20d as a backup to the 1D Mark II, with the lack of AF at f8 being the last thing that kept me from doing so. Do the math using the 'multiplier' effect, and there's not as much difference as you'd think. On the 1D, a 200mm lens with the 1.4TC gives you a 200x1.3x1.4 effective focal length, or 364mm. On the 20D, using the same lens WITHOUT a TC, you get 200x1.6, or 320mm. Not a huge difference, you've still got AF at f5.6, and the added image quality and weight benefits of not needing the TC. OTOH, I would love to see the mid-range 3D (or whatever) that would fill in the gaps which keep me from using the 20D as much as I thought I would. For me, faster AF performance and a better viewfinder for low light/fast action conditions would make it a better option, and making the big battery grip optional would seal the deal. Paul Wasserman * **** ******* *********************************************************** * For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see: * http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm ***********************************************************
