Well, the 20D will seem pretty cheaply made compared to a T90 as well, but on the other side of the coin, it really can produce fine images. It's too bad the registration differences were such that FD lenses on EOS bodies wasn't possible without compromising.
The 20D will also seem a lot smaller, esp if you have big hands. That was one thing I didn't like moving from the 10D. Tom P. > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > Ken Durling > Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2006 12:08 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: RE: Elan 7 -> EOS-1N > > Great feedback, Tom, thanks. I have to confess I didn't even > think about the flash aspect. It's not much of an issue in > the field, but I do shoot with flash in other contexts, of > course. And I've certainly grown accustomed to and perhaps > even a bit dependent on E-TTL, both on the Elan and on my > G2. So yes it would be best to stick with that. > > Interesting comment about stepping back to the 20D. It > confirms some funny doubts I have, partly from reading specs > and partly from handling one in a store. My main camera now > is a pair of T-90s, which is really almost a manual focus > EOS-1, so I think I know what you mean. > > Thanks again, > Ken > * **** ******* *********************************************************** * For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see: * http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm ***********************************************************
