On 14 Feb 2006 at 22:45, Tom Pfeiffer wrote:
> Ken, just my opinion, worth no more than any, less than most.
>
> I loved my 1n dearly, it was my first pro model Canon and it was (an is) a
> fantastic camera. But if you already have an Elan 7 and you're contemplating
> a digital body, I'd suggest you look at an EOS 3 instead. Virtually every
> feature of the 1n, although slightly less tank-like, plus newer AF and more
> importantly, ETTL like your Elan and whatever digital body you end up with.
> While you may not use a lot of flash with your long lenses (or maybe you own
> a couple of better beamers already), wouldn't it be simpler to have a single
> flash system to deal with?
Btw 1(n) vs 3 (and other in the context of eye-focus): seems the IR-
sensor that comes with the eye-focus system requires a IR-pass or -
block filter in the viewfinder, leading to a slight color deviation
in the red spectrum.
(I only have this discussion seen in a German newsgroup, in which it
was questioned why the viewfinder of the 3 did not get the best note,
like the 1....apparently it is more than just having 100% image or
not....)
Can't recall ever having seen this discussion elsewhere.
--
Bye,
Willem-Jan Markerink
The desire to understand
is sometimes far less intelligent than
the inability to understand
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
[note: 'a-one' & 'en-el'!]
*
****
*******
***********************************************************
* For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
* http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
***********************************************************
