On Nov 20, 10:02 pm, Craig Weinberg <[email protected]> wrote: > On Nov 20, 7:30 am, kedra marbun <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Nov 19, 10:20 pm, Craig Weinberg <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Why is it important to differentiate evidentialism & reliabilism? > > > i don't know. > > Oh. In that case I would assume that the question is meaningless. It's > an argument between aether and phlogiston. They're both wrong.
huh? someone not knowing about something does render that something meaningless, but only to her, she surely can't claim that something as a mumble jumble full of hard-to-accept untestable axioms, where argumentative leaps are the kings what can one say about the importance of a distinction, when he doesn't even understand the meanings of the things being distinguished? suppose you don't understand the meanings of democracy & aristoracy, what can you say about the importance of their diffs? you can say it's meaningless to you, but ones who know what they mean don't have to, or even can't, agree with you don't get the entailments reversed i'll gladly tell you the importance, when i finally hopefully learn the meanings of them, promise gee, i believed the topic that i brought here was basic in epistemology because it's discussed in overview of the subject, but the belief isn't justified evidently spend some time to read the stuffs will you, it'll take only a few minutes, especially for you -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Epistemology" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/epistemology?hl=en.
