On Nov 19, 10:20 pm, Craig Weinberg <[email protected]> wrote: > Why is it important to differentiate evidentialism & reliabilism?
i don't know. the proponents of them are the ones doing the differentiation i just want to know what exactly the diffs are, if any, & whether they're actually important after reading the 2 articles above further, i believe the contention is actually on their implications, namely internalism & externalism (sorry about another set of ism, they just don't know how to resist, don't they), but this belief isn't yet justified btw, if you're interested, i found this paper by Alvin Goldman that seeks to synthesize the 2 ism http://fas-philosophy.rutgers.edu/goldman/Toward%20a%20Synthesis%20of%20Reliabilism%20and%20Evidentialism.pdf -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Epistemology" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/epistemology?hl=en.
