Kostas, What sort of overhaul did you get? What are the compression check readings on the cylinders? I wonder if the rings are properly seated yet or the cylinder walls have glazed from improper seating. Did you have this airplane and fly it before the overhaul or did you just buy it? I ask this to verify that the performance change is due to only the engine overhaul. Continental spells out what carb jets should be installed so I would not go messing with the jets other then to verify that they are correct. Did this carb work OK before the overhaul? Was it overhauled with the engine?
Kevin1 --- In [email protected], kostas vegas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Dear all good day >  > Hartmut was right for my carb heat. Finally flapper found stack in closed position. > Rectified and now I can see a drop of 100 rpm on my tach. > The issue is that Iâm still at the lowest side (2150 max) of the allowed static range 2110-2225 and on the air never exceed the 2350. > During take off on a very nice day with only 18 C temp found very hard to climb out with two persons on board and limited fuel (my climbing rate was less than 300 fpm) and before reach 1500 feet we observed high lub oil temp (over 200F). > My A&P insist that we are still suffering of poor mixture and he wants to change the main jet and nozzle with something bigger, any idea? >  > Regards > Konstantinos Tsgdis > Athens Greece > > > > ___________________________________________________________ > ΧÏηÏιμοÏοιείÏε Yahoo!; > Î'αÏεθήκαÏε Ïα ενοÏληÏικά μηνÏμαÏα (spam); Το Yahoo! Mail > διαθÎÏει Ïην καλÏÏεÏη Î´Ï Î½Î±Ïή ÏÏοÏÏαÏία καÏά ÏÏν ενοÏληÏικÏν > Î¼Î·Î½Ï Î¼Î¬ÏÏν http://login.yahoo.com/config/mail?.intl=gr >
