I would suggest sending the notifications to the dev list instead of to one-or-two developer's inboxes, but otherwise if you're happy with Hudson by all means stick with it.
----- Original Message ---- > From: Richard Hirsch <[email protected]> > To: [email protected] > Sent: Wed, January 27, 2010 4:29:09 PM > Subject: Re: ESME-47 "Some Licensing Nits" is now closed > > Hudson is working fine - I'm thinking about hooking it up to our Amazon > cloud instances > > D. > > On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 10:20 PM, Daniel Kulp wrote: > > > On Wed January 27 2010 4:13:30 pm Joe Schaefer wrote: > > > Not to overload this discussion with more extraneous information, > > > but Gavin McDonald is the other contracted sysadmin at Apache > > > who specializes in providing build/CI services with buildbot. > > > > > > > > > That's also something this project would be well-advised to look > > > into if it's not already participating in the hudson build farm > > > at Apache. > > > > It's already in Hudson: > > http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/ESME/ > > > > I don't see any reason to change to buildbot if the Hudson stuff is working > > fine. > > > > Dan > > > > > > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ---- > > > > > > > From: Anne Kathrine Petterøe > > > > To: [email protected] > > > > Sent: Wed, January 27, 2010 3:36:09 PM > > > > Subject: Re: ESME-47 "Some Licensing Nits" is now closed > > > > > > > > Well at least we can't say ESME-47 was good for nothing ;-) > > > > > > > > We now have a NOTICE and a LICENSE file where they should be, learned > > > > that we can use git-svn and met a lot of awesome people on our list. > > > > > > > > On 27. jan. 2010, at 21.25, Ethan Jewett wrote: > > > > > Clearly I should Google before assuming something can't be done. > > > > > Thanks Joe and Daniel. > > > > > > > > > > Ethan > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 3:17 PM, Joe Schaefer wrote: > > > > >> Jukka uses git-svn all the time for pushing commits to our svn > > > > >> server. There's a wiki page which explains what you need to do > > > > >> to the git mirrors to enable full svn interoperability: > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> http://wiki.apache.org/general/GitAtApache > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> ----- Original Message ---- > > > > >> > > > > >>> From: Ethan Jewett > > > > >>> To: [email protected] > > > > >>> Sent: Wed, January 27, 2010 3:13:16 PM > > > > >>> Subject: Re: ESME-47 "Some Licensing Nits" is now closed > > > > >>> > > > > >>> Just for the record: Other developers *want* to use git (at least I > > > > >>> do), but I only want to use git if I can push back upstream from my > > > > >>> git repo, which I don't think you can do from a mirror. Not sure > > > > >>> though. > > > > >>> > > > > >>> Ethan > > > > >>> > > > > >>> On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 2:55 PM, Joe Schaefer wrote: > > > > >>>> What I'm talking about are the official mirrors at > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> http://git.apache.org/ > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> If David was/is the only developer using git, then I > > > > >>>> wouldn't bother with the infrastructure request. But > > > > >>>> if others use it, it makes sense to request support > > > > >>>> for git. > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> ----- Original Message ---- > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>>> From: Anne Kathrine Petterøe > > > > >>>>> To: [email protected] > > > > >>>>> Sent: Wed, January 27, 2010 2:50:56 PM > > > > >>>>> Subject: Re: ESME-47 "Some Licensing Nits" is now closed > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>>> The git mirror was something David set up, so I assume we can > > just > > > > >>>>> delete > > > > > > > > it > > > > > > > > >>>>> now. > > > > >>>>> Or is anyone still using it? > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>>> On 27. jan. 2010, at 20.46, Joe Schaefer wrote: > > > > >>>>>> Another thing I notice is a .gitignore file. If the devs > > > > >>>>>> are using git-svn and would like to encourage others to do > > > > >>>>>> so, it makes sense to request a git mirror from infrastructure. > > > > >>>>>> github has an arrangement with Apache to sync from our git > > > > >>>>>> mirrors every so often, so you pick up that benefit as well. > > > > >>>>>> The win for me as a sysadmin is that the git mirrors do all > > > > >>>>>> the history scraping once, and dishes it out to any interested > > > > >>>>>> user, instead of each user scraping the history (slowly) out > > > > >>>>>> of svn. > > > > >>>>>> > > > > >>>>>> > > > > >>>>>> > > > > >>>>>> ----- Original Message ---- > > > > >>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>> From: Joe Schaefer > > > > >>>>>>> To: [email protected] > > > > >>>>>>> Sent: Wed, January 27, 2010 2:34:59 PM > > > > >>>>>>> Subject: Re: ESME-47 "Some Licensing Nits" is now closed > > > > >>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>> Put the DISCLAIMER in trunk too I guess. It really depends > > > > >>>>>>> on how ESME gets packaged up for release- all 3 of those files > > > > >>>>>>> need to be at the base directory of the package. > > > > >>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>> ----- Original Message ---- > > > > >>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>> From: Anne Kathrine Petterøe > > > > >>>>>>>> To: [email protected] > > > > >>>>>>>> Sent: Wed, January 27, 2010 2:32:49 PM > > > > >>>>>>>> Subject: Re: ESME-47 "Some Licensing Nits" is now closed > > > > >>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>> Good we are getting this sorted out now. > > > > >>>>>>>> I don't think we ever had a LICENSE file. It is this one I > > > > >>>>>>>> assume? http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.txt > > > > >>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>> I will do another commit now, where I add a LICENSE.txt file > > to > > > > >>>>>>>> the > > > > >>> > > > > >>> trunk. > > > > >>> > > > > >>>>>>>> At the same time I will move the NOTICE file to the trunk as > > > > >>>>>>>> well. What about the DISCLAIMER at the base? Should it stay > > > > >>>>>>>> where it is? > > > > >>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>> On 27. jan. 2010, at 20.25, Joe Schaefer wrote: > > > > >>>>>>>>> The contents of the NOTICE file look perfect now. What has > > > > >>>>>>>>> me wondering is why you put it at the base of the svn tree > > > > >>>>>>>>> instead of inside trunk/. And where is the corresponding > > > > >>>>>>>>> LICENSE file for ESME? NOTICE should be right next to that. > > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>> ----- Original Message ---- > > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>> From: Anne Kathrine Petterøe > > > > >>>>>>>>>> To: [email protected] > > > > >>>>>>>>>> Sent: Wed, January 27, 2010 2:10:28 PM > > > > >>>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: ESME-47 "Some Licensing Nits" is now closed > > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>> Thanks Joe. > > > > >>>>>>>>>> Just committed the NOTICE file again now. > > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>> On 27. jan. 2010, at 19.59, Joe Schaefer wrote: > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> ----- Original Message ---- > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> From: Anne Kathrine Petterøe > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> To: [email protected] > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Sent: Wed, January 27, 2010 1:15:22 PM > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Subject: ESME-47 "Some Licensing Nits" is now closed > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Hi everyone, > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Just wanted to let everyone know that I just closed > > ESME-47 > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> "Some > > > > >>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>> Licensing > > > > >>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Nits". > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ESME-47 > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> A big thank you to everyone who has helped resolve this > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> issue! > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> /Anne > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> Well done. Technically there should be a line for Apache's > > > > > > > > copyright > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> interest in ESME at the top of the NOTICE file as well, see > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> http://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html#notice > > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>> __________________________________________________ > > > > >>>>>>>>> Do You Yahoo!? > > > > >>>>>>>>> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection > > around > > > > >>>>>>>>> http://mail.yahoo.com > > > > >>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>> __________________________________________________ > > > > >>>>>>> Do You Yahoo!? > > > > >>>>>>> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around > > > > >>>>>>> http://mail.yahoo.com > > > > >> > > > > >> __________________________________________________ > > > > >> Do You Yahoo!? > > > > >> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around > > > > >> http://mail.yahoo.com > > > > > > __________________________________________________ > > > Do You Yahoo!? > > > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around > > > http://mail.yahoo.com > > > > > > > -- > > Daniel Kulp > > [email protected] > > http://www.dankulp.com/blog > >
