A bit late, but I would also like to have the git interface set up.
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 12:11 AM, Joe Schaefer <[email protected]> wrote: > I would suggest sending the notifications to the dev list > instead of to one-or-two developer's inboxes, but otherwise > if you're happy with Hudson by all means stick with it. > > > > ----- Original Message ---- >> From: Richard Hirsch <[email protected]> >> To: [email protected] >> Sent: Wed, January 27, 2010 4:29:09 PM >> Subject: Re: ESME-47 "Some Licensing Nits" is now closed >> >> Hudson is working fine - I'm thinking about hooking it up to our Amazon >> cloud instances >> >> D. >> >> On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 10:20 PM, Daniel Kulp wrote: >> >> > On Wed January 27 2010 4:13:30 pm Joe Schaefer wrote: >> > > Not to overload this discussion with more extraneous information, >> > > but Gavin McDonald is the other contracted sysadmin at Apache >> > > who specializes in providing build/CI services with buildbot. >> > > >> > > >> > > That's also something this project would be well-advised to look >> > > into if it's not already participating in the hudson build farm >> > > at Apache. >> > >> > It's already in Hudson: >> > http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/ESME/ >> > >> > I don't see any reason to change to buildbot if the Hudson stuff is working >> > fine. >> > >> > Dan >> > >> > >> > > >> > > >> > > ----- Original Message ---- >> > > >> > > > From: Anne Kathrine Petterøe >> > > > To: [email protected] >> > > > Sent: Wed, January 27, 2010 3:36:09 PM >> > > > Subject: Re: ESME-47 "Some Licensing Nits" is now closed >> > > > >> > > > Well at least we can't say ESME-47 was good for nothing ;-) >> > > > >> > > > We now have a NOTICE and a LICENSE file where they should be, learned >> > > > that we can use git-svn and met a lot of awesome people on our list. >> > > > >> > > > On 27. jan. 2010, at 21.25, Ethan Jewett wrote: >> > > > > Clearly I should Google before assuming something can't be done. >> > > > > Thanks Joe and Daniel. >> > > > > >> > > > > Ethan >> > > > > >> > > > > On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 3:17 PM, Joe Schaefer wrote: >> > > > >> Jukka uses git-svn all the time for pushing commits to our svn >> > > > >> server. There's a wiki page which explains what you need to do >> > > > >> to the git mirrors to enable full svn interoperability: >> > > > >> >> > > > >> >> > > > >> http://wiki.apache.org/general/GitAtApache >> > > > >> >> > > > >> >> > > > >> >> > > > >> ----- Original Message ---- >> > > > >> >> > > > >>> From: Ethan Jewett >> > > > >>> To: [email protected] >> > > > >>> Sent: Wed, January 27, 2010 3:13:16 PM >> > > > >>> Subject: Re: ESME-47 "Some Licensing Nits" is now closed >> > > > >>> >> > > > >>> Just for the record: Other developers *want* to use git (at least I >> > > > >>> do), but I only want to use git if I can push back upstream from my >> > > > >>> git repo, which I don't think you can do from a mirror. Not sure >> > > > >>> though. >> > > > >>> >> > > > >>> Ethan >> > > > >>> >> > > > >>> On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 2:55 PM, Joe Schaefer wrote: >> > > > >>>> What I'm talking about are the official mirrors at >> > > > >>>> >> > > > >>>> http://git.apache.org/ >> > > > >>>> >> > > > >>>> >> > > > >>>> If David was/is the only developer using git, then I >> > > > >>>> wouldn't bother with the infrastructure request. But >> > > > >>>> if others use it, it makes sense to request support >> > > > >>>> for git. >> > > > >>>> >> > > > >>>> >> > > > >>>> ----- Original Message ---- >> > > > >>>> >> > > > >>>>> From: Anne Kathrine Petterøe >> > > > >>>>> To: [email protected] >> > > > >>>>> Sent: Wed, January 27, 2010 2:50:56 PM >> > > > >>>>> Subject: Re: ESME-47 "Some Licensing Nits" is now closed >> > > > >>>>> >> > > > >>>>> The git mirror was something David set up, so I assume we can >> > just >> > > > >>>>> delete >> > > > >> > > > it >> > > > >> > > > >>>>> now. >> > > > >>>>> Or is anyone still using it? >> > > > >>>>> >> > > > >>>>> On 27. jan. 2010, at 20.46, Joe Schaefer wrote: >> > > > >>>>>> Another thing I notice is a .gitignore file. If the devs >> > > > >>>>>> are using git-svn and would like to encourage others to do >> > > > >>>>>> so, it makes sense to request a git mirror from infrastructure. >> > > > >>>>>> github has an arrangement with Apache to sync from our git >> > > > >>>>>> mirrors every so often, so you pick up that benefit as well. >> > > > >>>>>> The win for me as a sysadmin is that the git mirrors do all >> > > > >>>>>> the history scraping once, and dishes it out to any interested >> > > > >>>>>> user, instead of each user scraping the history (slowly) out >> > > > >>>>>> of svn. >> > > > >>>>>> >> > > > >>>>>> >> > > > >>>>>> >> > > > >>>>>> ----- Original Message ---- >> > > > >>>>>> >> > > > >>>>>>> From: Joe Schaefer >> > > > >>>>>>> To: [email protected] >> > > > >>>>>>> Sent: Wed, January 27, 2010 2:34:59 PM >> > > > >>>>>>> Subject: Re: ESME-47 "Some Licensing Nits" is now closed >> > > > >>>>>>> >> > > > >>>>>>> Put the DISCLAIMER in trunk too I guess. It really depends >> > > > >>>>>>> on how ESME gets packaged up for release- all 3 of those files >> > > > >>>>>>> need to be at the base directory of the package. >> > > > >>>>>>> >> > > > >>>>>>> >> > > > >>>>>>> >> > > > >>>>>>> ----- Original Message ---- >> > > > >>>>>>> >> > > > >>>>>>>> From: Anne Kathrine Petterøe >> > > > >>>>>>>> To: [email protected] >> > > > >>>>>>>> Sent: Wed, January 27, 2010 2:32:49 PM >> > > > >>>>>>>> Subject: Re: ESME-47 "Some Licensing Nits" is now closed >> > > > >>>>>>>> >> > > > >>>>>>>> Good we are getting this sorted out now. >> > > > >>>>>>>> I don't think we ever had a LICENSE file. It is this one I >> > > > >>>>>>>> assume? http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.txt >> > > > >>>>>>>> >> > > > >>>>>>>> I will do another commit now, where I add a LICENSE.txt file >> > to >> > > > >>>>>>>> the >> > > > >>> >> > > > >>> trunk. >> > > > >>> >> > > > >>>>>>>> At the same time I will move the NOTICE file to the trunk as >> > > > >>>>>>>> well. What about the DISCLAIMER at the base? Should it stay >> > > > >>>>>>>> where it is? >> > > > >>>>>>>> >> > > > >>>>>>>> On 27. jan. 2010, at 20.25, Joe Schaefer wrote: >> > > > >>>>>>>>> The contents of the NOTICE file look perfect now. What has >> > > > >>>>>>>>> me wondering is why you put it at the base of the svn tree >> > > > >>>>>>>>> instead of inside trunk/. And where is the corresponding >> > > > >>>>>>>>> LICENSE file for ESME? NOTICE should be right next to that. >> > > > >>>>>>>>> >> > > > >>>>>>>>> >> > > > >>>>>>>>> >> > > > >>>>>>>>> >> > > > >>>>>>>>> ----- Original Message ---- >> > > > >>>>>>>>> >> > > > >>>>>>>>>> From: Anne Kathrine Petterøe >> > > > >>>>>>>>>> To: [email protected] >> > > > >>>>>>>>>> Sent: Wed, January 27, 2010 2:10:28 PM >> > > > >>>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: ESME-47 "Some Licensing Nits" is now closed >> > > > >>>>>>>>>> >> > > > >>>>>>>>>> Thanks Joe. >> > > > >>>>>>>>>> Just committed the NOTICE file again now. >> > > > >>>>>>>>>> >> > > > >>>>>>>>>> On 27. jan. 2010, at 19.59, Joe Schaefer wrote: >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> ----- Original Message ---- >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> From: Anne Kathrine Petterøe >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> To: [email protected] >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Sent: Wed, January 27, 2010 1:15:22 PM >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Subject: ESME-47 "Some Licensing Nits" is now closed >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Hi everyone, >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Just wanted to let everyone know that I just closed >> > ESME-47 >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> "Some >> > > > >>>>>>> >> > > > >>>>>>> Licensing >> > > > >>>>>>> >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Nits". >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ESME-47 >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> A big thank you to everyone who has helped resolve this >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> issue! >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> /Anne >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> Well done. Technically there should be a line for Apache's >> > > > >> > > > copyright >> > > > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> interest in ESME at the top of the NOTICE file as well, see >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> http://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html#notice >> > > > >>>>>>>>> >> > > > >>>>>>>>> __________________________________________________ >> > > > >>>>>>>>> Do You Yahoo!? >> > > > >>>>>>>>> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection >> > around >> > > > >>>>>>>>> http://mail.yahoo.com >> > > > >>>>>>> >> > > > >>>>>>> __________________________________________________ >> > > > >>>>>>> Do You Yahoo!? >> > > > >>>>>>> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around >> > > > >>>>>>> http://mail.yahoo.com >> > > > >> >> > > > >> __________________________________________________ >> > > > >> Do You Yahoo!? >> > > > >> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around >> > > > >> http://mail.yahoo.com >> > > >> > > __________________________________________________ >> > > Do You Yahoo!? >> > > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around >> > > http://mail.yahoo.com >> > > >> > >> > -- >> > Daniel Kulp >> > [email protected] >> > http://www.dankulp.com/blog >> > > > > > >
