I just looked at various files in our repository (property files, html files, etc.) and many do not have the apache license. There are some scripts available(https://svn.apache.org/repos/private/committers/). Does one of the committers have a unix box where they run the scripts to add the license to the other files. Before I run rat, I'd like to change the licenses.
Scripts: We also scripts in SVN with various copyrights. What do we need and what can we toss. Is there a way to pull in these scripts via the build process so that we are not part of our SVN? Here are few examples below: (http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/incubator/esme/trunk/server/src/main/webapp/scripts/jquery-1.3.2.min.js?view=markup). http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/incubator/esme/trunk/server/src/main/webapp/scripts/tip_balloon.js?view=markup http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/incubator/esme/trunk/server/src/main/webapp/scripts/wz_tooltip.js?view=markup D. On 1/28/10, Vassil Dichev <[email protected]> wrote: > A bit late, but I would also like to have the git interface set up. > > > On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 12:11 AM, Joe Schaefer <[email protected]> > wrote: >> I would suggest sending the notifications to the dev list >> instead of to one-or-two developer's inboxes, but otherwise >> if you're happy with Hudson by all means stick with it. >> >> >> >> ----- Original Message ---- >>> From: Richard Hirsch <[email protected]> >>> To: [email protected] >>> Sent: Wed, January 27, 2010 4:29:09 PM >>> Subject: Re: ESME-47 "Some Licensing Nits" is now closed >>> >>> Hudson is working fine - I'm thinking about hooking it up to our Amazon >>> cloud instances >>> >>> D. >>> >>> On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 10:20 PM, Daniel Kulp wrote: >>> >>> > On Wed January 27 2010 4:13:30 pm Joe Schaefer wrote: >>> > > Not to overload this discussion with more extraneous information, >>> > > but Gavin McDonald is the other contracted sysadmin at Apache >>> > > who specializes in providing build/CI services with buildbot. >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > That's also something this project would be well-advised to look >>> > > into if it's not already participating in the hudson build farm >>> > > at Apache. >>> > >>> > It's already in Hudson: >>> > http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/ESME/ >>> > >>> > I don't see any reason to change to buildbot if the Hudson stuff is >>> > working >>> > fine. >>> > >>> > Dan >>> > >>> > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > ----- Original Message ---- >>> > > >>> > > > From: Anne Kathrine Petterøe >>> > > > To: [email protected] >>> > > > Sent: Wed, January 27, 2010 3:36:09 PM >>> > > > Subject: Re: ESME-47 "Some Licensing Nits" is now closed >>> > > > >>> > > > Well at least we can't say ESME-47 was good for nothing ;-) >>> > > > >>> > > > We now have a NOTICE and a LICENSE file where they should be, >>> > > > learned >>> > > > that we can use git-svn and met a lot of awesome people on our >>> > > > list. >>> > > > >>> > > > On 27. jan. 2010, at 21.25, Ethan Jewett wrote: >>> > > > > Clearly I should Google before assuming something can't be done. >>> > > > > Thanks Joe and Daniel. >>> > > > > >>> > > > > Ethan >>> > > > > >>> > > > > On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 3:17 PM, Joe Schaefer wrote: >>> > > > >> Jukka uses git-svn all the time for pushing commits to our svn >>> > > > >> server. There's a wiki page which explains what you need to do >>> > > > >> to the git mirrors to enable full svn interoperability: >>> > > > >> >>> > > > >> >>> > > > >> http://wiki.apache.org/general/GitAtApache >>> > > > >> >>> > > > >> >>> > > > >> >>> > > > >> ----- Original Message ---- >>> > > > >> >>> > > > >>> From: Ethan Jewett >>> > > > >>> To: [email protected] >>> > > > >>> Sent: Wed, January 27, 2010 3:13:16 PM >>> > > > >>> Subject: Re: ESME-47 "Some Licensing Nits" is now closed >>> > > > >>> >>> > > > >>> Just for the record: Other developers *want* to use git (at >>> > > > >>> least I >>> > > > >>> do), but I only want to use git if I can push back upstream >>> > > > >>> from my >>> > > > >>> git repo, which I don't think you can do from a mirror. Not >>> > > > >>> sure >>> > > > >>> though. >>> > > > >>> >>> > > > >>> Ethan >>> > > > >>> >>> > > > >>> On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 2:55 PM, Joe Schaefer wrote: >>> > > > >>>> What I'm talking about are the official mirrors at >>> > > > >>>> >>> > > > >>>> http://git.apache.org/ >>> > > > >>>> >>> > > > >>>> >>> > > > >>>> If David was/is the only developer using git, then I >>> > > > >>>> wouldn't bother with the infrastructure request. But >>> > > > >>>> if others use it, it makes sense to request support >>> > > > >>>> for git. >>> > > > >>>> >>> > > > >>>> >>> > > > >>>> ----- Original Message ---- >>> > > > >>>> >>> > > > >>>>> From: Anne Kathrine Petterøe >>> > > > >>>>> To: [email protected] >>> > > > >>>>> Sent: Wed, January 27, 2010 2:50:56 PM >>> > > > >>>>> Subject: Re: ESME-47 "Some Licensing Nits" is now closed >>> > > > >>>>> >>> > > > >>>>> The git mirror was something David set up, so I assume we can >>> > just >>> > > > >>>>> delete >>> > > > >>> > > > it >>> > > > >>> > > > >>>>> now. >>> > > > >>>>> Or is anyone still using it? >>> > > > >>>>> >>> > > > >>>>> On 27. jan. 2010, at 20.46, Joe Schaefer wrote: >>> > > > >>>>>> Another thing I notice is a .gitignore file. If the devs >>> > > > >>>>>> are using git-svn and would like to encourage others to do >>> > > > >>>>>> so, it makes sense to request a git mirror from >>> > > > >>>>>> infrastructure. >>> > > > >>>>>> github has an arrangement with Apache to sync from our git >>> > > > >>>>>> mirrors every so often, so you pick up that benefit as well. >>> > > > >>>>>> The win for me as a sysadmin is that the git mirrors do all >>> > > > >>>>>> the history scraping once, and dishes it out to any >>> > > > >>>>>> interested >>> > > > >>>>>> user, instead of each user scraping the history (slowly) out >>> > > > >>>>>> of svn. >>> > > > >>>>>> >>> > > > >>>>>> >>> > > > >>>>>> >>> > > > >>>>>> ----- Original Message ---- >>> > > > >>>>>> >>> > > > >>>>>>> From: Joe Schaefer >>> > > > >>>>>>> To: [email protected] >>> > > > >>>>>>> Sent: Wed, January 27, 2010 2:34:59 PM >>> > > > >>>>>>> Subject: Re: ESME-47 "Some Licensing Nits" is now closed >>> > > > >>>>>>> >>> > > > >>>>>>> Put the DISCLAIMER in trunk too I guess. It really depends >>> > > > >>>>>>> on how ESME gets packaged up for release- all 3 of those >>> > > > >>>>>>> files >>> > > > >>>>>>> need to be at the base directory of the package. >>> > > > >>>>>>> >>> > > > >>>>>>> >>> > > > >>>>>>> >>> > > > >>>>>>> ----- Original Message ---- >>> > > > >>>>>>> >>> > > > >>>>>>>> From: Anne Kathrine Petterøe >>> > > > >>>>>>>> To: [email protected] >>> > > > >>>>>>>> Sent: Wed, January 27, 2010 2:32:49 PM >>> > > > >>>>>>>> Subject: Re: ESME-47 "Some Licensing Nits" is now closed >>> > > > >>>>>>>> >>> > > > >>>>>>>> Good we are getting this sorted out now. >>> > > > >>>>>>>> I don't think we ever had a LICENSE file. It is this one I >>> > > > >>>>>>>> assume? http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.txt >>> > > > >>>>>>>> >>> > > > >>>>>>>> I will do another commit now, where I add a LICENSE.txt >>> > > > >>>>>>>> file >>> > to >>> > > > >>>>>>>> the >>> > > > >>> >>> > > > >>> trunk. >>> > > > >>> >>> > > > >>>>>>>> At the same time I will move the NOTICE file to the trunk >>> > > > >>>>>>>> as >>> > > > >>>>>>>> well. What about the DISCLAIMER at the base? Should it >>> > > > >>>>>>>> stay >>> > > > >>>>>>>> where it is? >>> > > > >>>>>>>> >>> > > > >>>>>>>> On 27. jan. 2010, at 20.25, Joe Schaefer wrote: >>> > > > >>>>>>>>> The contents of the NOTICE file look perfect now. What >>> > > > >>>>>>>>> has >>> > > > >>>>>>>>> me wondering is why you put it at the base of the svn >>> > > > >>>>>>>>> tree >>> > > > >>>>>>>>> instead of inside trunk/. And where is the corresponding >>> > > > >>>>>>>>> LICENSE file for ESME? NOTICE should be right next to >>> > > > >>>>>>>>> that. >>> > > > >>>>>>>>> >>> > > > >>>>>>>>> >>> > > > >>>>>>>>> >>> > > > >>>>>>>>> >>> > > > >>>>>>>>> ----- Original Message ---- >>> > > > >>>>>>>>> >>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> From: Anne Kathrine Petterøe >>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> To: [email protected] >>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> Sent: Wed, January 27, 2010 2:10:28 PM >>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: ESME-47 "Some Licensing Nits" is now closed >>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> >>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> Thanks Joe. >>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> Just committed the NOTICE file again now. >>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> >>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> On 27. jan. 2010, at 19.59, Joe Schaefer wrote: >>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> ----- Original Message ---- >>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> >>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> From: Anne Kathrine Petterøe >>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> To: [email protected] >>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Sent: Wed, January 27, 2010 1:15:22 PM >>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Subject: ESME-47 "Some Licensing Nits" is now closed >>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> >>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Hi everyone, >>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> >>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Just wanted to let everyone know that I just closed >>> > ESME-47 >>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> "Some >>> > > > >>>>>>> >>> > > > >>>>>>> Licensing >>> > > > >>>>>>> >>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Nits". >>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ESME-47 >>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> >>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> A big thank you to everyone who has helped resolve >>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> this >>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> issue! >>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> >>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> /Anne >>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> >>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> Well done. Technically there should be a line for >>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> Apache's >>> > > > >>> > > > copyright >>> > > > >>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> interest in ESME at the top of the NOTICE file as well, >>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> see >>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> >>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> http://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html#notice >>> > > > >>>>>>>>> >>> > > > >>>>>>>>> __________________________________________________ >>> > > > >>>>>>>>> Do You Yahoo!? >>> > > > >>>>>>>>> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection >>> > around >>> > > > >>>>>>>>> http://mail.yahoo.com >>> > > > >>>>>>> >>> > > > >>>>>>> __________________________________________________ >>> > > > >>>>>>> Do You Yahoo!? >>> > > > >>>>>>> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection >>> > > > >>>>>>> around >>> > > > >>>>>>> http://mail.yahoo.com >>> > > > >> >>> > > > >> __________________________________________________ >>> > > > >> Do You Yahoo!? >>> > > > >> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around >>> > > > >> http://mail.yahoo.com >>> > > >>> > > __________________________________________________ >>> > > Do You Yahoo!? >>> > > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around >>> > > http://mail.yahoo.com >>> > > >>> > >>> > -- >>> > Daniel Kulp >>> > [email protected] >>> > http://www.dankulp.com/blog >>> > >> >> >> >> >> >
