Mark has no interest whether it is simpler to use Hydrogen or not.
He even does not care that the use of Hydrogen will increase the amount
of CO2 being burned (so, it is a disaster for the environment).
He is promoting Hydrogen - that is all. Look up his profile and you will

I urge all members of this forum to once again adhere to the earlier
decision to avoid Hydrogen as a topic, because it is.... explosive.

Cor van de Water
Chief Scientist
Proxim Wireless Corporation
Email: Private:
Skype: cor_van_de_water Tel: +1 408 383 7626

-----Original Message-----
From: EV [] On Behalf Of Bill Woodcock
via EV
Sent: Sunday, July 27, 2014 10:58 AM
To: Mark Abramowitz
Cc: Electric Vehicle Discussion List
Subject: Re: [EVDL] Tesla might Supercharge EVs to regain 400mi in 15min
for7 credits

On Jul 27, 2014, at 10:39 AM, Mark Abramowitz <>

> I've seen an animation of such a device for natural gas dispensing,
and am told it could just as easily be done for hydrogen.

How does that address what I said?  I've seen animations of the
Incredible Hulk, that doesn't support the proposition that it could
"just as easily be done for X."

> But we know that whatever is being talked about... trip to the moon,
world peace, cold fusion... you will be certain that it is "simpler,
cheaper, and easier than hydrogen."

So, prove me wrong.  What is it about hydrogen that you think is easier
to move than electrons?


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 841 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
For EV drag racing discussion, please use NEDRA

For EV drag racing discussion, please use NEDRA 

Reply via email to