David Nyman wrote:
> For this to be what is producing PC, the instantiating, or > constitutive, level must be providing whatever information is necessary > to 'animate' 3-person transactional 'data' in phenomenal form, and in > addition whatever processes are contingent on phenomenally-animated > perception must be causally effective at the 3-person level (if we are > to believe that possessing PC actually makes a difference). This seems > a bit worrying in terms of the supposed inadmissability of 'hidden > variables' in QM (i.e the transactional theory of reality). But PC isn't *extra* information It is a re-presentation of what is coming in through the senses by 3rd person mechanisms. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
