David Nyman wrote:

> For this to be what is producing PC, the instantiating, or
> constitutive, level must be providing whatever information is necessary
> to 'animate' 3-person transactional 'data' in phenomenal form, and in
> addition whatever processes are contingent on phenomenally-animated
> perception must be causally effective at the 3-person level (if we are
> to believe that possessing PC actually makes a difference). This seems
> a bit worrying in terms of the supposed inadmissability of 'hidden
> variables' in QM (i.e the transactional theory of reality).

But PC isn't *extra* information It is a re-presentation of
what is coming in through the senses by 3rd person mechanisms.

 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 

Reply via email to