> I am realizing that I don't have time to get into this.  I assume that
> your use of the word "model" is equivalent to "theory".

Er, no.  I mean a foundational mathematical model which includes at
least one set representative of the multiverse, or at the very least a
countable transitive submodel that satisfies the same constraints.
I'm using the word "model" in the specific set-theoretic sense.


You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 

Reply via email to