Hi Gordon, Le 20-nov.-08, à 21:40, Gordon Tsai a écrit :
> Bruno: > I think you and John touched the fundamental issues of human > rational. It's a dilemma encountered by phenomenology. Now I have a > question: In theory we can't distinguish ourselves from a Lobian > Machine. But can lobian machines truly have sufficient rich > experiences like human? This is our assumption. Assuming comp, we are machine, so certainly some machine can have our rich experiences. Indeed, us. > For example, is it possible for a lobian machine to "still its > mind' or "cease the computational logic" like some eastern philosophy > suggested? Maybe any of the out-of-loop experience is still part of > the computation/logic, just as our out-of-body experiences are > actually the trick of brain chemicals? Eventually we will be led to the idea that it is the "brain chemicals" which are the result of a trick of "universal consciousness", but here I am anticipating. Let us go carefully step by step. I think I will have some time this afternoon to make MGA 2, See you there ... Bruno http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/ --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To post to this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
