On Wed, Dec 03, 2008 at 04:53:11PM +0100, Bruno Marchal wrote: > > I really don't know. I expect that the mathematical structure, as seen > from inside, is so big that Platonia cannot have it neither as element > nor as subpart. (Ah, well, I am aware that this is counter-intuitive, > but here mathematical logic can help to see the consistency, and the > quasi necessity with formal version of comp). >
This point rather depends on what Platonia contains. If it contains all sets of cardinality 2^{\aleph_0}, then the inside view of the deployment will be conatained in it. I do understand that your concept of Platonia (Arithmetic Realism I believe you call it) is a Kronecker-like "God made the integers, all the rest was made by man", and so what you say would be true of that. Cheers -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- A/Prof Russell Standish Phone 0425 253119 (mobile) Mathematics UNSW SYDNEY 2052 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Australia http://www.hpcoders.com.au ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To post to this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---