Dear George,
I was missing more of your contributions on this list lately (years?). Let
me reflect to a few of your topics:

A decade or so ago I was named 'resident chaotician' on another list - later
changed my mind when I was disenchanted by the 'physical chaologists' who
picked some 'chaotic' problems that seemed to them as calculable in the
original (greek mythological) chaos: the unfathomable uncalculable
(pre-geometrical?) plenitude of which the Chronos-Zeus family derived our
"Kraxlwerk" (world). Since then I put 'chaos' into the maze of
scale-differences (more than just SOME orders of magnitude?) that conflate
our math-based thinking. We learn to think about 'chaotic' (very slowly, but
we do, indeed).
Thank you for leading (me?) towards Tohu-va-Bohu (what I always wrote in one
'tohuvabohu' in ANY language and applied it for some unresolvable mixup in a

*"And God saw the light and it was good"* is translated in some other
languages as "And God saw THAT the light was good" (Rabbit: which one is
close to the original?) Does not underline an omniscient God. Now - your God
= Consciousness is to my liking: I could not identify either of them. I
consider Ccness a covering noumenon of many phenomena detected over a long
cultural history and in my speculations I boiled it down to "responding to
information" - self-recursively, or not. E.g. the response of an electron to
a + charge etc.
So it really covers the entire World as you connotation would imply for God
= Consciousness.
>From this position it is obvious that I am not much for the Anthropic
Principle. It is a backwards thinking from visualizing "US" (as God's
children?) as the main actors in the world. We are not.

*Consciousness can only see order in the world that it perceives:* reminds
me both David Bohm's *'ORDER'* as whatever we know of (and could arrange
into the order of our knowledge) - as contrasted such *'explicit
(order)'*to the
*'implicit' world  --  *a n d  also to Colin Hales' mini-solipsism about
everybody carrying as a personalized (partial) world-content (reality?) the
content of one's mind *in the personally adjusted formulation.* I like to
call it a *"perceived reality".* Which I find congruent with your
"consciousness filters out the world from chaos".

I still feel that R.Rabbit would add more content to 'God' than just
consciousness. (Cf: Bruno's 'Theos').

John M

On 6/17/10, George Levy <> wrote:
> Hi Rabbi Rabbit.
> Welcome
> I haven't contributed to this list for a while but I have been reading it.
> Here is a possible connection between the Kabbalah and the Multiverse,
> which I will describe in a bulleted fashion for brevity.
> The initial chaos, "Tohu va Bohu," (from which the French word tohu bohu)
> is equivalent to what is known in this list as the Plenitude.
> The first light "Or" is not a physical light at all but it is the awakening
> of consciousness.
> The separation that God performs (And God divided the light from the
> darkness), is mediated by what is called on this list the Anthropic
> Principle. In essence, the just awakened consciousness can only be aware of
> the part of the Tohu va Bohu that can support the consciousness's own
> existence. Consciousness can only see order in the world that it perceives.
> The sentence "And God saw the light and it was good" is interesting because
> consciousness is a self referencing phenomenon. God saw the light but
> consciousness also saw the light - itself. This means that God and
> consciousness are identical.
> God, consciousness and the world co-emerge out of chaos. Consciousness
> filters the world out of Chaos. More specifically, *any instance* of
> consciousness "to be what it is" (in the human experience, with consistent
> memories and logical capabilities) requires the corresponding world "to be
> what it is" (to be ordered, with  consistent histories and logical physical
> laws). Consciousness and the world mirror each other and therefore, they are
> in their own image. There can be many different consciousnesses, each one
> being in fact a whole world.
> Best Regards
> George
> Rabbi Rabbit wrote:
> Dear Jason,
> My assumption is that the Name of God, according to Abraham Abulafia,
> could be made of any possible combination of the 22 letters, as long
> as this name does not exceed 22 characters. This includes repetitions
> of letters and any combination between 1 and 22 characters.
> Thank you for your wise remark, it was indeed not clear enough as I
> formulated it previously.
> Yours truly,
> R. Rabbit
>  --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Everything List" group.
> To post to this group, send email to
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> .
> For more options, visit this group at

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
For more options, visit this group at

Reply via email to