Behind in this group. I think that if you had a this Universe and
replace the particles with its antiparticles.there should be no
difference from the human observer POV.
On Dec 20, 4:51 am, Bruno Marchal <marc...@ulb.ac.be> wrote:
> On 19 Dec 2010, at 18:29, ronaldheld wrote:
> > Jason
> > I would think normally the implant should work as well. Being
> > Bajorean, could the missing essence be the influence of the Prophets?
> > Data and the EMH should be able to pass the Turing test.
> > Maybe I am missing something. A matter human in a matter universe
> > should function the same as an antimatter human in an antimatter
> > universe, AFAIK
> How do you know that?
> Of course it is a consequence of comp + the level is enough high to
> allow electron to to be substituted by positron, etc. But if comp is
> false, then you need an explicit hypothesis of invariance for the
> matter/antimatter change.
> And from a logical point of view, we can make a comp theory of mind
> with the matter/antimatter change no more working (using string
> theory, for example).
> Comp, or digital mechanism assumes that there is a substitution level,
> not that we can know what is that level. Indeed, it can be shown that
> if we are machine, then we cannot know which machine we are, but can
> infer it with some degree of plausibility from the observable reality.
> Saying "yes" to the doctor asks for a leap of faith. Of course we have
> biological reasons/observations to assume that the level is probably
> much higher than the internal working of particles and strings.
> > Ronald
> > On Dec 18, 12:57 pm, Jason Resch <jasonre...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> Ronald,
> >> I remember that episode. I thought it was quite a departure from the
> >> atheistic slant that was usual to star trek.
> >> ( For those not familiar with the
> >> scene:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ihdI8U9eS4c#t
> >> =2m30s)
> >> They seemed to suggest in the episode that the operation failed not
> >> because
> >> of a defect in the artificial brain but because there was something
> >> more to
> >> the mind that the machine didn't capture, some soul or some essence
> >> that
> >> couldn't be copied. This is contrary to the frequent use of
> >> transporters
> >> throughout the series, unless you accept something like biological
> >> naturalism (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biological_naturalism),
> >> the idea
> >> that only biochemistry has the right stuff or can do the right
> >> things to
> >> create consciousness. I don't think the writers of that episode
> >> were well
> >> versed in philosophy of mind, so I wouldn't put too much stock in
> >> the ideas
> >> they promote. For that episode to make sense you either have to
> >> accept
> >> dualism or biological naturalism (which is almost like a form of
> >> dualism).
> >> Do you think that Commander Data, whose entire brain is positronic,
> >> lacks
> >> consciousness? I like the argument Picard gave for Data's
> >> sentience:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YWNPeNEvMN4
> >> You mentioned that you had no problem with the idea of a person
> >> made from
> >> anti-matter particles. What if scientists invented tiny machines
> >> that were
> >> not atoms but operated all the same, would you accept that you
> >> could build a
> >> person using these? Taking the idea slightly further, lets say
> >> these little
> >> faux-atoms were expensive, so scientists decided to model the
> >> machines in a
> >> computer rather than make them. Simulating a small number of them
> >> together
> >> they could predict how nano-machines behaved. If the scientists
> >> modeled a
> >> much larger collection of these atoms, organized in the same way as
> >> in a
> >> person, do you think any of the complexity is lost?
> >> Jason
> >> On Sat, Dec 18, 2010 at 8:05 AM, ronaldheld <ronaldh...@gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>> Bruno and Jason
> >>> The complexity issue concerns me, perhaps because of the Deep
> >>> space
> >>> 9 episode:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/
> >>> Life_Support_(Star_Trek:_Deep_Space_Nine)
> >>> Ronald
> >>> On Dec 16, 11:39 am, Jason Resch <jasonre...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>> On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 7:57 AM, ronaldheld <ronaldh...@gmail.com>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>>> Jason:
> >>>>> I do not think a neutron take more trhan a finite amount of
> >>>>> voltage
> >>>>> to be able to fire. I do wonder if merely replacing the bio
> >>>>> parts by
> >>>>> processing hardware, do you lose the part of the complexity of the
> >>>>> mind? Np problem with an antimatter man and mind.
> >>>> If the mechanical replacements have the same repertoire and
> >>>> behavior as
> >>> the
> >>>> biological parts I don't see how the complexity would be
> >>>> lessened. Many
> >>>> people feel lessened to be thought of as a machine, but they
> >>>> probably
> >>> don't
> >>>> fully appreciate just how complex of a machine the brain is. It
> >>>> has 100
> >>>> billion neurons (about 1 for each stars in this galaxy) and close
> >>>> to 1
> >>>> quintillion connections or 1,000,000,000,000,000 (about 1
> >>>> connection for
> >>>> every cent of US debt). People aren't familiar with man-made
> >>>> machines
> >>>> anywhere near this level of complexity and so it is
> >>>> understandable that
> >>> one
> >>>> could doubt a machine acting like a human. However, I think this is
> >>> mainly a
> >>>> prejudice instilled by the types of (comparatively simple)
> >>>> machines we
> >>> deal
> >>>> with on a daily basis.
> >>>> Jason
> >>> --
> >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> >>> Groups
> >>> "Everything List" group.
> >>> To post to this group, send email to email@example.com
> >>> .
> >>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> >>> everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com<everything-list
> >>> %2Bunsubscribe@ googlegroups.com>
> >>> .
> >>> For more options, visit this group at
> >>>http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.-Hide quoted
> >>> text -
> >> - Show quoted text -
> > --
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> > Groups "Everything List" group.
> > To post to this group, send email to everything-l...@googlegroups.com.
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
> > .
> > For more options, visit this group
> > athttp://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en
> > .
> http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/- Hide quoted text -
> - Show quoted text -
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-l...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
For more options, visit this group at