Bruno and Jason
   The complexity issue concerns me, perhaps because of the Deep space
9 episode:

On Dec 16, 11:39 am, Jason Resch <> wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 7:57 AM, ronaldheld <> wrote:
> > Jason:
> >   I do not think a neutron take more trhan a finite amount of voltage
> > to be able to fire. I do wonder if merely replacing the bio parts by
> > processing hardware, do you lose the part of the complexity of the
> > mind? Np problem with an antimatter man and mind.
> If the mechanical replacements have the same repertoire and behavior as the
> biological parts I don't see how the complexity would be lessened.  Many
> people feel lessened to be thought of as a machine, but they probably don't
> fully appreciate just how complex of a machine the brain is.  It has 100
> billion neurons (about 1 for each stars in this galaxy) and close to 1
> quintillion connections or 1,000,000,000,000,000 (about 1 connection for
> every cent of US debt).  People aren't familiar with man-made machines
> anywhere near this level of complexity and so it is understandable that one
> could doubt a machine acting like a human. However, I think this is mainly a
> prejudice instilled by the types of (comparatively simple) machines we deal
> with on a daily basis.
> Jason

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
For more options, visit this group at

Reply via email to