On 2/11/2011 7:02 PM, Charles wrote:
That's a bit simplistic. The nett result of EPR/Bell/Aspect is either-
indeterminism-or-nonlocal-hidden-variable. If NLHV's can be disproved,
that proves indeterminism
Actually there is a third alternative, which is to take the time
symmetry of physical law seriously, as suggested by Huw Price in
"Time's Arrow and Archimedes' Point". That explains all the above (EPR/
Bell/Aspect) without any additional assumptions such as FTL
signalling, causality violation, hidden variables etc. (Bell himself
admitted that this was the only loophole in his argument.)

John Cramer's trying to work that out in his transactional interpretation. In late 2009 he was about do an experiment to demonstrate retrocausality. Anyone know how that turned out?


You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
For more options, visit this group at 

Reply via email to