Another good Schrodinger quote: "Scientific theories serve to facilitate the survey of our observations and experimental findings. Every scientist knows how difficult it is to remember a moderately extended group of facts, before at least some primitive theoretical picture about them has been shaped. It is therefore small wonder, and by no means to be blamed on the authors of original papers or of text-books, that after a reasonably coherent theory has been formed, they do not describe the bare facts they have found or wish to convey to the reader, but clothe them in the terminology of that theory or theories. This procedure, while very useful for our remembering the facts in a well-ordered pattern, tends to obliterate the distinction between the actual observations and the theory arisen from them. And since the former always are of some sensual quality, theories are easily thought to account for sensual qualities; which, of course, they never do."
In a similar vein, Democritus’s imagined conversation between the intellect and the senses: “Intellect: ‘Color is by convention, sweet by convention, bitter by convention; in truth there are but atoms and the void.’ Senses: ‘Wretched mind, from us you are taking the evidence by which you would overthrow us? Your victory is your own fall.’” Rex On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 3:47 PM, Evgenii Rudnyi <use...@rudnyi.ru> wrote: > On 06.07.2011 21:36 meekerdb said the following: >> >> On 7/6/2011 12:22 PM, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote: >>> >>> On 06.07.2011 05:14 Constantine Pseudonymous said the following: >>>> >>>> Bruno assumes that consciousness preceded matter.... > > ... >>> >>> If talk about consciousness, then I guess the next quote from Erwin >>> Schrödinger should be appropriate >>> >>> "The doctrine of identity can claim that it is clinched by the >>> empirical fact that consciousness is never experienced in the >>> plural, only in the singular. Not only has none of us ever >>> experienced more than one consciousness, but there is also no trace >>> of circumstantial evidence of this ever happening anywhere in the >>> world." >> >> Of course we infer the consciousness of others. To experience more >> than one consciousness at the same time seems to defy the meaning of >> consciousness. But Schrodinger may have just had in mind that >> consciousness is always associated with only a singular body - unlike >> the Borg in which a single mind has many bodies. >> >> Brent > > I do not know actually what Schroedinger wanted to say there, I have to read > him again. Let me quote the last paragraph from that chapter Oneness of > Mind: > > "Let me briefly mention the notorious atheism of science which comes, of > course, under the same heading. Science has to suffer this reproach again > and again, but unjustly so. No personal god can form part of world model > that has only become accessible at the cost of removing everything personal > from it. We know, when God is experienced, this is an event as real as an > immediate sense perception or as one's own personality. Like them he must be > missing in the space-time picture. I do not find God anywhere in space and > time - that is what the honest naturalist tells you. For this he incurs > blame from him in whose catechism is written: God is spirit." > > Evgenii > http://blog.rudnyi.ru > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Everything List" group. > To post to this group, send email to firstname.lastname@example.org. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To post to this group, send email to email@example.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.