On 19 Jul 2011, at 21:16, meekerdb wrote:
On 7/19/2011 11:32 AM, ronaldheld wrote:
Given limited resources and for only 1 program, it does not seem
logical to learn LISP. Are there Windows or DOS executables of the
FWIW. I use MAPLE and not Mathematica.
Maple is based on LISP. An executable UD wouldn't be very
interesting. Since it doesn't halt what would you do with it? It's
the program itself that is more interesting.
Absolutely. Even more important is the understanding that the UD, and
its mathematical execution is embedded in the first order arithmetical
true relation. This is not obvious, nor easy to prove. But it is
proved in any accurate proof of Gödel's theorem for arithmetic.
Also, I would say to Ronald that it is easy to write a code for the UD
in any language. I guess it will be a tedious work in a language like
Fortran, but that might be a good exercise in programming. But again,
you are right: it makes no sense to program a UD. The running is
infinite. The only reasons to program it are pedagogical and
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
For more options, visit this group at