Given limited resources and for only 1 program, it does not seem
logical to learn LISP. Are there Windows or DOS executables of the UD?
FWIW. I use MAPLE and not Mathematica.
               Ronald

On Jul 19, 10:14 am, Bruno Marchal <marc...@ulb.ac.be> ote:
> On 18 Jul 2011, at 21:26, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
>
> > On 18.07.2011 14:21 ronaldheld said the following:
> >> Bruno:
> >>    I do not know LISP. Any UD code written in Fortran?
> >>                     Ronald
>
> > Very good book to learn LISP is
>
> >http://mitpress.mit.edu/sicp/full-text/book/book.html
>
> A great classic book indeed. Very good indeed.
>
> For the beginners, "The Little Lisper" by Daniel P. Friedman is a chef-
> d'oeuvre of pedagogy.
> I don't find any version online, alas.
> Here are reference for its third edition (but it looks out of print!):
>
> http://mitpress.mit.edu/catalog/item/default.asp?ttype=2&tid=4879
>
>
>
> > Just click Next page, read and so on. By the way, List is much nicer  
> > than Fortran. I have learned Lisp after Fortran - C - C++ and I  
> > should say that I love Lisp (well, I prefer Mathematica - it is a  
> > Lisp with a human face).
>
> I guess we have a different conception of what is a human face :)
> I do have problems with the syntax of Mathematica, but it might be  
> that I have never succeeded in compiling it in the right way. It might  
> be due also to the fact that I use cheap versions, I dunno.
>
> > Yet, the real programmer must start with Lisp. If she will be scared  
> > by too many brackets, for example
>
> > (define (fast-expt b n)
> >  (cond ((= n 0) 1)
> >        ((even? n) (square (fast-expt b (/ n 2))))
> >        (else (* b (fast-expt b (- n 1))))))
>
> > then she should forget about programming.
>
> Of course, the brackets are what makes the syntax of Lisp so  
> transparent. Indeed the programs have the structure of the data-
> structures handled naturally by Lisp (the lists). This makes meta-
> programming very easy. The "Gödel number" of (define ...) is just  
> (quote (define ...)). Together with its functional nature, it makes  
> Lisp particularly easy for (third person) self-reference. Lisp is very  
> close, in spirit, with the combinators or the lambda calculus, on  
> which I have talked about regularly.
>
> Bruno
>
> http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.

Reply via email to