On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 12:44 AM, Stephen P. King <[email protected]>wrote:
> On 7/22/2011 1:24 AM, Jason Resch wrote: > >> >> All the relevant parts of relativity which imply block time have been >> confirmed. The above is like arguing against gravity because Newton's >> theory wasn't compatible with the observations of Mercury's orbit. >> >> Hi Jason, > > Could you be more specific? Exactly which "relevant parts which imply > block time have been confirmed" and how? Special relativity, time dilation due to speed, non simultaneity of events reported by observers in different reference frames, and so on. And to Brent's point, regarding the conflict between relativity and QM, that issue is with GR, SR is not in conflict with QM. This paper explains it well: http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/2408/ Jason -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.
