On Jul 24, 12:05 am, Jesse Mazer <[email protected]> wrote: > Substantivalism doesn't treat spacetime as a "substance" in the sense of > necessarily being made up of discrete grainy bits (which is all that the > gamma ray prediction was meant to test, > seehttp://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2011/06/110630111540.htm), it just > says that spacetime has physical properties of its own, like the notion of > the different curvature at different points in spacetime which is present in > general relativity.
I think that the inferred curvature of space can be explained by perceptual relativity of physical phenomena rather than any physical properties of the vacuum between them. Space is the void-continuity between matter, time is the continuity-void between energy changes. Craig -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.
