On Aug 3, 9:51 am, Stathis Papaioannou <stath...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 10:57 PM, Craig Weinberg <whatsons...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Wouldn't that be never, since there is not necessarily a limit to the
> > number of possible inputs or outputs of consciousness?
> We don't test the consciousness of our fellow humans by observing the
> effect of all possible inputs, so why should a machine be subjected to
> more stringent testing?
Because we are human and we know that we are conscious so we can
assume that other things which resemble us are also human and also
conscious. I wouldn't assume any such thing for a machine.
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to email@example.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
For more options, visit this group at