On Sun, Aug 14, 2011 at 12:47 AM, Evgenii Rudnyi <use...@rudnyi.ru> wrote:
>> How could the rest of your brain possibly respond differently if it
>> receives exactly the same stimulation? Perhaps you mean that it
>> would be able to tell that there is an artificial device there due
>> to electric fields and so on; but in that case the artificial device
>> is not appropriately reproducing the I/O behaviour of the original
> The question is what does it mean the same stimulation. I guess that you
> mean now only electrical signals. However, it well might be the qualia plays
> the role as well.
The artificial device must replicate all the I/O behaviour of the
original neurons at the interface with the rest of the brain. This is
purely a problem for engineers who neither know nor care about qualia.
The question is, given that the engineering problem is solved, would
consciousness necessarily be preserved? I think it would, because
otherwise we would have a partial zombie.
> If I understand you correctly, you presume that conscious experience could
> be resolved within 'normal science' (there is no Hard Problem). Jeffrey Gray
> on the other hand acknowledges the Hard Problem and he believes that a new
> scientific theory will be needed to solve it.
In the recent posts I do not propose any theory of consciousness, I am
just interested in whether consciousness would be preserved if I had
my brain replaced with artificial components. If the answer is "yes"
that still does not explain why we are conscious at all or how
consciousness is generated.
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to email@example.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
For more options, visit this group at