On 2/7/2012 3:56 AM, acw wrote:
Well, Copenhagen doesn't even describe an underlying model, it's just a predictive model, a "don't ask what's going on" model, thus while it will give you correct results, it won't tell you what's really going on.

That assumes that something is 'really going on'. If you take an instrumentalist view (c.f. Asher Peres or Leslie Ballentine) then all that's 'going on' is that your information changes and hence you change your model.


You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
For more options, visit this group at 

Reply via email to