On 2/14/2012 10:36 AM, Quentin Anciaux wrote:

        The flaw is the entire structure of UDA+MGA, it assumes the
    existence of the very thing that is claims cannot exist. It is a
    theory that predicts that it cannot exist. How? By supposedly
    proving that the physical world does not exist.

It does not prove that the physical world does not exist... it proves that a *primitive* material world is irrelevant to predict your next moment, the current physics of the world. Whether there is a primitive material world or not cannot change your expectation of your next moment, rendering this primitive material world devoid of explanatory power.
HI Quentin,

What is the difference? Please see my last post to ACW with the subject header "Re: On Pre-existing Fields"



You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
For more options, visit this group at 

Reply via email to